1. Historians have argued that the First World War was the pre-eminent event of the 20 Century, as it set the political agenda for the remainder of the century. Do you agree? If so, why? If not, why not? Be specific.
The first world war was a conflict of science with an ideological and rational agenda. We have emerged out of the days of darkness and captured a slave ; science! With this science we have acquired great powers. We have soared to the skies with man made birds. We have captured the power to annihilate. That was known prior to world war I with the intellect of the great Einstein and associates. The Aryan race was the master race. If you really do want me to quote someone : Einstein - physicist, Freud - philosopher, Von Braun - rocket scientist, Marx - Economist, Wright Bros - Aviation pioneers … All German! All, except Marx lived the first world war. Marx’s theories, a major instigating factor for the conflict. The problem lay in the fact that conflict is inevitable in social relations and in history, it didn’t matter - the conflict would be resolved with the death of the few and the reign of the lion of the jungle. Very similar to behavior in monkeys and dogs. The aggressive impulse and need for a scarce resource. Law and Order is important in any society, let alone an advanced civilization.
To quote another : Machiavelli - the end justifies the means. The use of reasonable force is acceptable when the end is peace. To stop conflict by the means of a forceful overthrow of a reigning monarch or a totalitarian approach to suppress aggression is by all means acceptable. This view was in line with Marx, another German whose theory on economic organisation would have lead the German militarization for supremacy. Rousseau - submission of general will by social contract. The submission of individual sovereignty is a fairly new concept and difficult to rationalize to the illiterate ; To enjoy the riches of the world, one has to adhere to social contract. We can use this idea to understand the need of a world federation, however one has to look over their shoulder to see the cause of the shadows. locke - in a state of nature, conflict is inevitable. This is why we had the first world war. It is by no means the first conflict of man, it is merely the first time we had airplanes to involve the whole known world. The great thinkers of the Aryan race understood this concept of conflict. Political ideological debates would have been ripe around the turn of the century, a time when Einstein and Freud were in contact and discussing world federation, a prescription of Kant and implied by Rousseau and Locke as they advocated for social contract. The inferior of the world do not know what they want when they haven’t tasted the riches of the world and they all live in conflict with their neighbors anyways; the need for a global socialist republic of Marx, by force if need be!
The problems of the first world war haven’t yet been resolved and it was the power of the reich!
2. World War II was fought to crush European fascism and Nazi bestiality. Do you agree with this statement? If so, why? If not, why not? Be specific.
I do not like the way you imply that Nazi Germany were beastly. It requires the power of great intellect to the determine the need to forcefully control the demands and supplies of the globe. The population of the world is expanding and the resources are limited. When there is a scarce resource and a proximity which is too close for comforts, there is going to be conflict. I have already quoted Rousseau, Locke and Marx. They all recognised that the submission of individual and state sovereignty were essential to a perpetual peace! With people like Einstein, Freud and Braun, living in germany during the interwar period, the depression of the people would have been insufferable. With the power in one hand and a nationalistic solidarity of the supreme race, the will to teach the masses better was summoned. It was essential for the better of mankind to be reigned by the supreme race. It makes sense - out of a batch of students at college, or society if you will, there is going to be a couple of students of a higher distinct level. It is those that are able that have to take the responsibility of civil service. It is for the pursuit of utilitarianism, that all have the opportunity to achieve happiness. This is possible for the entire globe, however the problem of negotiating a peaceful trading social contract with machetes on the table.
As the British and French made a total mess of their reign over the globe with the violent Imperial revolutions tearing down their empires, the need for an immediate solution for the reign was necessary. The problem of the Jews still exists and there has been no apparent solution for the past seventy years. The problem of the Jews is that they are the super power. They figured out the best way to kill people. They are the ones who invented the gas chamber and they are the ones that invented nuclear science. This may seem as something that is crazy, however one has to realize that the winner writes the history. Who won the second world war? Who won the first world war? What happened to Ottoman? Hindustan? The Han dynasty? The Habsburgs? The last century has been the worst war in the world because of the Jews. They are the ones who hold the power. It was they who created with their superior minds. It was their inventions. They have their names splashed all over the field of science. From Einstein to Freud, the power of the republic was strong. Their power needed an army and they got it in the US. They destroyed the world and took the UN with their superior power. With the UN cornered with the power of nuclear weapons, they partitioned off Israel and a military base. An ally close to the east is always beneficial and a port to deploy arsenal is only a necessity in any strategic defence. The problem of the Jews is that they believe that they have the support of the Lord. They believe that they have dominion on Earth as the chosen people. They are waiting for the promised land and they also have passages in the old testament on how to deal with aggressors. History says that the Jews were exterminated and that was the cause of the second world war, however the story has to be examined a little closer. Where are your references for the atrocities over 60 years ago? I was taught not to believe everything I read, however I do read and critically analyse.
5. The bombings of Hiroshima and, three days later, Nagasaki were terrible acts of war, but they were no crime. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? And why? Be specific.
Machiavelli - the end justifies the means and reasonable force is acceptable to reign with peace. The use of the atomic bomb was sad, however was necessary to demonstrate power and show who’s the boss. When dealing with conflict and the ice isn’t broken yet … a whiskey isn’t downed …. a cigar and joint aren’t smoked … with the language barrier, there is so much conflict, as we are living in a multicultural world. There was limited communication between the races during the start of globalization. Everyone was xenophobic. They all shunned their neighbors. The problem was that our forefathers have been in battle for centuries and have taught us to fear our neighbors. We have learned from history and have decided, as the chinese learnt, the best thing to do is build a wall. The Germans knew that was the best thing to do and Israel knows no better.
Diplomacy. You can’t label a book diplomacy and ramble on about the telephone calls of leaders in the past. They didn’t use phones! How was Stalin to skype Churchill and organize a peace! How can you claim knowledge about so much detail. You may like to think of yourself as a doctor and a great spokesman, however I can pick a hustler from a mile away. Diplomacy requires the crossing of boundaries that couldn’t be broken without the use of power. When an african beast is raping with a machete, it has to be controlled. It would have been wiser to use a nuke in Rwanda, than to witness the atrocities endured. How long can the powerful sit back and do nothing. It is a crime of indecision to let the tutsis and hutus to hack each other to death. Is it Einsteins fault or the manufacturer of the machete?
The lay are the problem. The illiterate do not know how to communicate because they never had any schooling. It is only after one has the power of the intellect, can one begin to reason! This is a virtue and has to be earnt. One needs to be be able to gain the power of reading first to be able to reason with philosophy. It is only once one is a philosopher, that diplomacy may begin. It is not possible to rationalize with a person wielding a machete or trying to debate the philosophy of the dopamine theory with a police officer and a gun in the holster. When nukes are in the back pocket … they have to be used!
The lay cannot reason! It is no crime to use a nuke to control the masses. Justice by all means.
6. In view of the changing fortunes of the world’s Great Powers, Southeast Asia can increasingly be expected to “lean” towards China. To what extent is this proposition true, in your opinion? Provide grounds on which your answer is based. Be specific.
Southeast Asia is part of India!
Culture is important. Blood heritage is important. Philosophical leaning is important. Previous ruling history and lineage is important. Hindustan has a very deep meaning in Southeast Asia. If it isn’t Brahma, it is shiva or buddha. Buddha is important because it is the essential part of the whole chinese culture as well as a lot of southeast asia. It is not only economic philosophy that unites this whole region. There is a daily exercise of yoga or chi kung. Breathing exercises unite this region in karmic philosophy. Buddha, an Indian prince, parted the wisdom of the Taj. From Malaysia, to Singapore, Bali to Nepal; Indians speak in Hindi.
I do not know how I am going to quote unspoken alliances. Do you wish I wire myself when these meetings take place? Diplomacy doesn’t allow cameras and mics or minutes. Political alignment is due to a lot of factors. How do I explain respect and honor to the illiterate? The monkeys in Africa do not have the power of the samurai. The samurai is a well disciplined member of a long lineage of temple history. The Pujari, brahmacharya, masters all the arts and sciences to rule as kshatriya.
No comments:
Post a Comment